Colleague George Dvorsky sent me a recent blog post of his, thinking that I might be interested -- the title is
"Overcoming Gender" , and it's a quick summary of a formal paper he and James Hughes are co-authoring on postgenderism. Perhaps it is my feminine nature, but I had to laugh when I read the summary because one of my
first thoughts was, "how typically male it is to see gender as something that
has to be overcome, rather than something to be embraced or even transcended." (a more tame version of what
Ken Wilber said about men and testosterone in
A Brief History of Everything ) -- so dualistic, rather than integrated.
But then again, I suppose one could argue that that just proves his point?
But then again, I suppose one could argue that that just proves his point?