This week’s Nature features a ni...

This week’s Nature features a nice battle between creationists and evolutionists in the correspondence section.

The debate contains the following parts:

A timely wake-up call as anti-evolutionists publicize their viewsp 679

U. Kutschera

doi:10.1038/444679a

Full Text | PDF (101K)

Creationist views have no basis in sciencep 679

Gabriela Lorenc-Pluci ska

doi:10.1038/444679b

Full Text | PDF (101K)

Creationists weaken society’s trust in scientistsp 679

Joanna Rutkowska

doi:10.1038/444679c

Full Text | PDF (101K)

Claim of bias against critics is refuted by publicationp 679

Gerdien de Jong and Gert Korthof

doi:10.1038/444679d

Full Text | PDF (101K)

Pseudoscience should not be published in Naturep 679

Uwe Balthasar and Susannah Maidment

doi:10.1038/444679e

Full Text | PDF (123K)

There is no new evidence that undermines evolutionp 680

Brian Charlesworth

doi:10.1038/444680a

Full Text | PDF (99K)

Walking with dinosaurs? Not in the real worldp 680

Gary S. Hurd

doi:10.1038/444680b

Full Text | PDF (100K)

Creationists pose political, not scientific, threatp 680

Jerzy Banbura

doi:10.1038/444680c

Full Text | PDF (100K)

How the word ‘hominid’ evolved to include homininp 680

Simon Underdown

doi:10.1038/444680d

Full Text | PDF (100K)