Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Ulysee W.'s Twitter Updates

ACS Stands Firm on Great American Smokeout; where's the CDC? Up in smoke. #smokeout #CDC #americancancersociety http://cli.gs/Phh941 10 days ago
HHS' Sebelius issues non-statement on #breastcancer recos http://bit.ly/2XKSdO She ignores that USPSTF is gov funded; policies often enactd. 11 days ago
RT @NPRHealth -Medicare And Medicaid Dominate 'Improper Payments' By Feds http://su.pr/2yiGY4 Why won't Obama tackle in #healthreform? 11 days ago
Government #breastcancer Recos: Harbinger of things to come from healthcare reform - care rationing. #healthreform http://cli.gs/6aghWv 13 days ago
New Breast Cancer Guidelines: No #morebirthdays for women. Sadly, @AmericanCancer is quiet on new Gov plan. http://cli.gs/6aghWv 13 days ago
 

Apotex Loses Battle for Plavix

Posted Oct 28 2008 9:56pm

Apotex, Inc. lost its battle for a generic version of Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Plavix today. BMS will enjoy patent protection until at least 2011. Plavix is BMS best selling product. The patent is owned by Sanofi-Aventis, which markets the product globally. The Apotex challenge has fueled rumors of BMS/Sanofi-Aventis merger.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Sidney Stein indicated Apotex failed to prove that the patent for Plavix was invalid.

Apotex CEO Barry Sherman said that winning the case would allow the company to “billions of dollars in savings” available to consumers. According to news reports, Apotex sold it generic version for only about 15% compared to the branded version (or about $20 a month in actual savings).

In 2006, Apotex launched the product “at risk,” hoping the Plavix patent was week. It obviously wasn’t. However, last year, Judge Stein allowed Apotex to sell through the six-month supply they had already shipped to the wholesalers.

Apotex indicated it would immediately appeal to the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C.
Post a comment
Write a comment: