"Belief" and the FDA

(Posted by Patrick Sullivan Jr.)

In my inbox from Charlie Brown, National Counsel of Consumers for Dental Choice:

In a public statement issued last week, FDA continues its policy of preserving a privileged -- and illegal -- status for the nation’s remaining pro-mercury dentists. FDA’s spokesperson claimed this product which is 50% toxic mercury may be sold based on a belief of safety.

“FDA spokeswoman Susan Cruzan said the agency does not comment on lawsuits. However, she noted the FDA is holding a two-day meeting in September to review scientific evidence on mercury fillings. In the meantime, Cruzan said, "We currently believe that they are safe."
--- Chicago Sun-Times, May 2, 2006 (article is attached)

FDA may not base its actions on a “ current belief.” FDA must – and for other devices does – require proof of safety by implant manufacturers.

I assume the lawsuit she is declining to comment on is Moms Against Mercury vs. Leavitt.

Read the rest of Charlie's excellent letter here. I'm glad that he is all over this fooey about " belief in safety" since after all, belief is immaterial to scientific reality. (Did I get that right DoC? :)

RELATED:Mercury Amalgams: Now Safe for Kids!