Join this community!
› Share page: Email Digg del.icio.us Reddit icon StumbleUpon Technorati
Go
Search posts:

Mark S.'s Twitter Updates

Just received an email for a coupon for an electronic gift card for a discount on pole dancing cardio classes. #primal fail #marketing fail 11 days ago
How do you raise healthy kids? http://su.pr/6hfvwi 11 days ago
Food isn't MY only #primal pleasure, @dbitzan .... I also enjoy maxing out my heart rate. You know, doing beach sprints. 12 days ago
Box jumping and rope jumping are #primal, but bull jumping? http://su.pr/7QO9q8 12 days ago
Asceticism, hedonism, and health. Was Jack LaLanne wrong when he said, "If it tastes good, spit it out?" http://su.pr/2AAj4P 12 days ago
 

Some Very Intense News

Posted Jun 06 2008 2:00pm 2 Comments

Sprinting

Run, Run, Run!

A study (abstract here) published online in the American Journal of Physiology, Regulatory, Integrative & Comparative Physiology suggests that short but intense bouts of exercise can confer the same health benefits for the heart as longer, less-intense activities.

For the study, researchers from McMaster University in Ontario, Canada recruited 20 healthy but untrained individuals and assigned them to perform a six week series of either low-volume sprint interval training (SIT) or traditional high-volume endurance training (ET). Specifically, the SIT group performed between 4 and 6, 30-second “all-out” Wingate Sprint Tests separated by 4.5 min of recovery, 3 days per week. The ET group, meanwhile, completed 40-60 min of cycling at moderate intensity, 5 days per week.

After six weeks, both groups experienced equal improvement in the structure and function of heart vessels, specifically those that deliver blood to and from the heart and muscles.

Based on these findings, the researchers conclude that SIT is a “time-efficient strategy to elicit improvements in peripheral vascular structure and function that are comparable to ET.” They note that the findings underscore the value of brief, high-intensity forms of exercise and say that the data could be used to prove that even those with a limited amount of time can still benefit from exercise.

As we’ve discussed previously here at Mark’s Daily Apple, short, intense bursts of exercise aren’t just as good as long duration aerobic activities, they are better in many ways! In fact, our hunter-gatherer ancestors would have thought we were wasting resources (not to mention looking ridiculous!) if we took off on a moderately-paced jog around the plains for an hour a day! Today we strive to increase efficiency in every aspect of our lives - from eating on the go to multi-tasking on the job - so it seems almost comical that the one area where we have trouble condensing our time is in our exercise program (that is, of course, if you are someone who exercises to begin with).

Perhaps it started with Jack LaLanne who, at 93, still boasts 2 hour daily workouts or perhaps we as a society have come to equate endurance with fitness (because, seriously, who could argue that a marathon runner is not a fit human!). However, you have to remember, overtraining - or simply following an endurance-focused fitness regimen - can up your risk of overuse injuries, reduce energy, inhibit fitness gains, weaken the immune system and just really sap time! Again, this is not to say that short, interval training is the only way to exercise, but rather it’s an excellent foundation for your fitness routine and a wonderful way to get back to your primal roots!

alefbetac Flickr Photo (CC)

Further Reading:

Check out Mark's Daily Apple blog by clicking the link
Comments (2)
Sort by: Newest first | Oldest first
Hey, what about those female cave dwellers who were chasing kids all day and reaching or stooping to gather all those nuts and berries? You eed endurance for that kind of work. Maybe the ladies benefit more from longer, lower intensity workouts. Something to ponder....
mr.
very interesting
Post a comment
Write a comment: